E6K+argumentative+essay-Bell


 * Top: Children should never be educated at home by their parents. Do you agree or disagree? **

Children have been considering as the most important part of a family in the modern community. When they are accepting simple knowledge at schools, parents tend to have them staying home and learn form them for the reason of concern. Although there are some advantages for the under ages studying at home, this essay will show that the negative influences outweigh the benefits for a number of reasons. The first and most important reason to oppose children should not be educated at home by their parents is the problem of limited knowledge sources. Some young people might have accepted higher education than the ones in the past, they know a lot about their majors at school and have gain some cherished experiences about lives and works. They tend to have their children to be having a bright future as they have. However, a kid could cultivate out a narrow mind when they are growing up if they only accept narrow educations. Another reason to question whether kids should not __be taught familily / accept family-education__ is the personality issue. It has been proved by some professionals that the early age is the time of cultivating one’s personality. Studying at school can be beneficial to kids, for example, it is easier to make friends at school and kids can also learn the communication skills from an early age. Children fell happy about how many friends they have and they would like to play with the same ages. Therefore, kids can be more passive and begin to have a sense of caring about the people around since their school days. In contrast, a kid might tend to behave negatively if he or she only be caught at home. In conclusion, it is clear that there are too many negative influences related to the under ages accepting education at home. Children are suppose not only to learn things specifically but also to active themselves with the other same ages.

320